Читать книгу The Craft of Innovative Theology. Argument and Process онлайн

77 страница из 123

12 ssss1 Aquinas, ST, 3a.9.4.

13 ssss1 Corey L. Barnes, Christ’s Two Wills in Scholastic Thought: the Christology of Aquinas and Its Historical Contexts (Toronto, ON: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies 2012), 213.

14 ssss1 One solution that I am not discussing in this article is to build on the two natures distinction embedded in the Definition of Chalcedon. On this view one confines omniscience to the divine nature of Jesus and limited knowledge is then part of the human nature. A number of writers take this line. Thomas Morris in The Logic of God Incarnate (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press 1986), 103ff, argues for the “two minds view.” This also seems to be line in Gerald O’Collins, Christology: A Biblical, Historical, and Systematic Study of Jesus, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press,2009), 240. Collins explicitly writes, “With respect to his divinity Christ is omniscient, but with respect to his humanity he is limited in knowledge”.

15 ssss1 Pannenberg, God and Man, 329.