Читать книгу Epidemic Respiratory Disease. The pneumonias and other infections of the repiratory tract accompanying influenza and measles онлайн

61 страница из 67

A limited number of references to the extensive literature of the recent pandemic will amply serve to illustrate the various points of view that have developed.

Keegan[32] regards pneumonia as a complication and considers that B. influenzæ, the probable cause of influenza, is the primary cause of the pneumonia which may or may not be still further complicated by pneumococcus or streptococcus infection as a terminal event. Christian[33] states that epidemic influenza causes a clinically demonstrable bronchitis and bronchopneumonia in the larger proportion of cases, and lays particular emphasis upon the fact that it is quite incorrect to consider fatalities in the epidemic as due to influenza uncomplicated by bronchopneumonia. Blanton and Irons[34] speak of influenza as an “antecedent respiratory infection” of undetermined etiology, and believe that pneumonia when it occurs is due to autogenous infection by a variety of secondary invaders, principally of the pneumococcus and streptococcus groups. Hall, Stone, and Simpson[35] regard pneumonia strictly as a complication and quite distinct from influenza itself. Synnott and Clark[36] believe that the infection is characterized by a progressive intense exudative inflammation of the respiratory tract often terminating in an aspiration pneumonia with a variety of conditions found at autopsy and a multiplicity of secondary organisms responsible for the fatal termination. B. influenzæ was usually found but always with other organisms. Friedlander and his collaborators[37] speak of a fulminating fatal type of influenza with acute inflammatory pulmonary edema, but regard true bronchopneumonia as secondary, due to infection with pneumococcus or S. hemolyticus. B. influenzæ was not found more frequently than under normal conditions. Brem[38] and his collaborators present a clear cut clinical picture both of influenza and the secondary pneumonia to which it predisposes, regarding the latter as definitely due to secondary infection with pneumococcus, streptococcus or B. influenzæ, the virus of influenza being unknown. Ely[39] and his collaborators make no distinction between influenza and pneumonia, and apparently consider the epidemic due to a hemolytic streptococcus of indefinite and inconstant characters. The Camp Lewis Pneumonia Unit[40] states “the process [influenza], whether mild or severe, is etiologically and pathologically the same;***.” B. influenzæ was not found. In a report of The American Public Health Association[41] it is stated that deaths resulting from influenza are commonly due to pneumonias resulting from an invasion of the lungs by one or more forms of streptococci, by one or more forms of pneumococci, or by the so-called influenza bacillus. This invasion is apparently secondary to the initial attack. Wolbach[42] found B. influenzæ in a high proportion of cases, not infrequently in pure culture in the lung, and believes that there is a true influenzal pneumonia whether B. influenzæ is the cause of the primary disease or not. Spooner, Scott and Heath[43] isolated B. influenzæ in a high percentage of cases and consider it reasonable to suppose that it was the prime factor in the epidemic. Kinsella[44] found B. influenzæ infrequently and regards it as a secondary invader. MacCallum[45] regards B. influenzæ as a secondary invader and believes that it is responsible for a form of purulent bronchitis and bronchopneumonia following certain cases of influenza. Pritchett and Stillman[46] found B. influenzæ in 93 per cent of cases of influenza and bronchopneumonia. Hirsch and McKinney[47] state that B. influenzæ played no rôle in the epidemic at Camp Grant and apparently consider it due to a specially virulent pneumococcus.

Правообладателям