Читать книгу Studies on Epidemic Influenza: Comprising Clinical and Laboratory Investigations онлайн

62 страница из 69

ssss1

In referring to some of the associated conditions of influenza one scarcely knows whether to consider them as complications or sequelæ. The pathological process certainly had its origin from the influenzal attack, but at times apparently assumed an inactive stage. The patient is usually free from any specific influenzal symptoms, but retains for a long time other symptoms referable to various organs, or he may have been normal for a shorter or a longer period and then suddenly develop symptoms apparently independent of the previous infection. It may be well to consider all such conditions which followed the febrile attack, whether immediately or more remotely, as sequelæ, and I shall therefore speak of them as such.

The first and probably the most interesting and confusing are the conditions found in the lungs following influenza. A chronic bronchitis, an old bronchiectasis, or a previous tuberculous lesion in whatsoever stage, may present acute symptoms and signs which are difficult to interpret. The question always arises in the individual case—is this a process due to the recent influenzal attack, or was it there before the attack? Is it of streptococcic, pneumococcic, or tuberculous origin? The history of previous diseases of the lungs may help to arrive at a diagnosis. The history of the severity of the influenzal attack is of very little help, because the apparently mildest attack may be followed by the most profound changes in the lungs, and the gravest attack with a history of definite lung infection may leave the lungs without a trace of the previous pathology. The physical examination is helpful, of course, in determining whether the lesion is at the apices or at the bases, and from this a reasonably safe inference may be drawn as to whether it is from a previous tuberculous lesion or a recent influenzal infection. The Roentgenologist depends almost entirely upon this localization. If the linear striæ are only at the apex, it is probably tuberculous; but if they are only at the base, or also at the base, it is likely to be an influenzal lung. In fact, the Roentgenologist with his present information is ready to admit that it is most difficult to speak definitely of the lungs in these cases. The possibility of confusing the post-influenzal lung with a tuberculous lesion is not peculiar to this epidemic. After the epidemic of 1889 and 1890 the same condition was observed by clinicians. Dr. Roland G. Curtin, of Philadelphia, in 1892 and 1893 conducted a series of clinics at the Philadelphia Hospital, in which he spoke of the “non-bacillary form of phthisis,” and showed case after case which he said might be diagnosed as pulmonary tuberculosis, but because of the recent epidemic and the absence of the tubercle bacillus he diagnosed them as post-influenzal lung.