Читать книгу Galatea онлайн

83 страница из 118

ssss1 The following statement occurs in Miguel de Cervantes, his life & works by Henry Edward Watts (London, 1895), p. 179, n. 1: "This French ambassador, called by the Spanish commentators the Duque de Umena, must have been the Duc de Mayenne, who was sent by the Regent Anne of Austria, to conclude the double marriage of the Prince of Asturias (afterwards Philip IV.) with Isabelle de Bourbon, and of Louis XIII. of France with the Infanta Ana, eldest daughter of Philip III."

The familiar formula—"must have been"—is out of place here. The necessity does not exist. It seems unlikely that Márquez Torres can have met the members of Mayenne's suite on February 25, 1615; for Mayenne's mission ended two and a half years previously. Mayenne and his attachés left Madrid on August 31, 1612: see Luis Cabrera de Córdoba, Relaciones de las cosas sucedidas en la Córte de España, desde 1599 hasta 1614 (Madrid, 1857), p. 493, and François-Tommy Perrens, Les Mariages espagnols sous le règne de Henri IV. et la régence de Marie de Médicis, 1602-1615 (Paris, 1869), pp. 403 and 416-417. "Umena" is, as everybody knows, the old Spanish form of Mayenne's title; but no Spaniard ever dreamed of applying this title to the ambassador of whom Márquez Torres speaks. As appears from a letter (dated February 18, 1615) to "old Æsop Gondomar," the special envoy to whom Márquez Torres refers was known as "Mr. de Silier": see Navarrete, op. cit., pp. 493-494. Mr. de Silier was the brother of Nicolas Brûlart, Marquis de Sillery, Grand Chancellor of France from September, 1607, to May, 1616. The special envoy figures in French history as the Commandeur Noel Brûlart de Sillery: he and his suite reached Madrid on February 15, 1615 (Navarrete, op. cit., p. 493), and they left that city on March 19, 1615 (Perrens, op. cit., p. 519). One might have hoped that, as M. de Sillery founded the mission of Sillery near Quebec, his name would be known to all educated Englishmen. His death on September 26, 1640, is mentioned by his confessor, St. Vincent de Paul, in a letter to M. Codoing, dated November 15, 1640. See Lettres de S. Vincent de Paul (Paris, 1882), vol. i., p. 100.